Risks relating to tailings dam failures across Australia, ranging from high to extreme, have been identified in self audits conducted by major mining companies Rio Tinto, BHP and Glencore, but they say they remain confident in their own assurance processes.
Tailings dams in WA, SA, NT and Queensland have all been found to have the highest public safety risk in the case of failure
Some of the identified mines have recently been approved for expansions
A Mount Isa Mines spokesperson said the ratings refers to the “potential maximum consequence — not the likelihood”
Four extreme-risk BHP tailings dams located at the Olympic Dam mine(SA), Whaleback iron ore mine (SA), Pilbara mine (WA), and the Leinster mine (WA)
Two high-risk dams inside Rio Tinto’s Andoom and Torro mines at Weipa in Queensland
Two high-risk dams inside Glencore’s Mount Isa Mines
Rio Tinto’s Weipa bauxite mines, Glencore’s Mount Isa Mines, and BHP’s Olympic Dam mine were recently approved for expansion.
The tailings dam of Mount Isa Mines, owned by Glencore, is located less than 10 kilometres from Mount Isa’s central business district.
Despite the audit identifying extreme and high-risk results, mining companies have said they are confident in their own assurance processes to mitigate risk to the public.
What is the risk?
Gavin Mudd, an associate professor of environmental engineering at RMIT University, said the history of tailings dam failures expanded beyond the potential impact to workers.
Dr Mudd said that despite the risk of tailings dam contents flowing out causing death, irreversible environmental impact was also a catastrophic risk.
“If you look at the Los Frailes tailings dam disaster in 1998, it didn’t kill anyone but it still caused a significant environmental impact,” Dr Mudd said.
Tailings dams and storage facilities can pose a risk of failing due to their large structures being subjected to physical pressure from liquid and solid product.
“Often they are metal-enriched ore bodies and that can cause significant public and environmental risk,” Dr Mudd said.
“Even if there is no heavy metal, chemical, or radiation risk associated with tailings, we still need to be worried about its physical risk.”
Australia’s history with tailings dam failures has not been exempt from controversy.
More than a decade ago, the Burton coal mine south-west of Mackay contaminated surrounding land after its tailings dam was breached.
The incident in 2007 was attributed to mining company Thiess inadequately monitoring the dam, along with failing to analyse the potential consequences.
No public risk to safety: mines
Despite its tailings dams scoring a high-risk rating, a spokesperson for Mount Isa Mines told the ABC that it had complete confidence that all requirements had been met to ensure public safety.
The spokesperson for the mine said flood events, extreme weather, and large earthquakes were all accounted for in its failure evaluations.
Dr Mudd said he believed that Australia’s mining sector required robust regulation to not let its attitude lapse.
“It requires acknowledgement by the companies that yes, the probability may be low but the consequences are huge,” he said.
“That way we can look at what way this risk is being managed and if it is acceptable.”
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.