Highlights
- Sustainability consulting firm ERM says the mining industry needs to do more to prevent tailings storage facility disasters and notes that a further 19 incidents is possible over the next decade
- ERM stated that while the technical and engineering causes of tailings dam disasters have been widely covered and researched, the organisational and human cases has not been well researched
- Find out the different types of TSFs
- See what score you get for your TSF monitoring program here
- Download this FREE guide to find out about the available solutions to help implement the Global Standard on Tailings Management
“Minimizing the risk of tailings dam failures is one of the greatest challenges facing the sector,” ERM stated in its report. “Despite the billions of dollars being invested and the recent launch of a global industry standard on tailings management, there is a concern that the industry is destined to do ‘too little too late’ to prevent further catastrophic incidents.”While the technical and engineering causes of tailings dam disasters have been covered extensively and include three major factors – slope instability, overtopping and foundation stability – ERM stated, “unfortunately the organizational and human or ‘adaptive’ causes have not been so well researched and yet these have been just as significant in contributing to catastrophic failures.”
“An over-reliance on engineering standards and considerations has led to a focus on the low likelihood of tailings dam failures – yet they continue to occur,” ERM noted.
A worker surveys the damage at the Brumadinho dam disaster in Brazil. Photo by Diego Baravelli/Wikimedia Commons.
“Indeed in almost all cases when a third party review is conducted of a tailings storage facility (TSF) considering the management of controls (e.g. training, deviation reporting, corrective action tracking, communication, and governance processes), significant breakdowns emerge quite readily. Any control strategy cannot be devoid of the human factor.”ERM noted that based on disclosed information on about 600 TSFs around the world, there are more than 1.3 million people living downstream and within 20 km of the waste storage dams. Of those, 57% live downstream of TSFs built using “upstream” construction methods. According to ERM, the upstream model “is considered to be the lowest initial cost for a raised tailings embankment due to the minimal amount of initial fill material required,” noting that about half of these upstream models are operational and another 25% are described as ‘inactive’ but haven’t been closed down or rehabilitated.
“Our analysis has considered the location and topography of these TSFs as well as the plausible flow trajectories,” ERM said. “Using satellite imagery, we have estimated that more than 70,000 sq. km of land, (an area the size of Scotland) is at risk of impact from these tailings facilities should they fail.”ERM also found that those people of greatest risk are living downstream of TSFs associated with copper mining operations. In an interview, Louise Pearce, ERM’s global managing mining and metals lead, said the report followed up data published by The Investor Mining & Tailings Safety Initiative, which is led by the Church of England Pension Board and Sweden’s AP Funds Council of Ethics. In April 2019, the Initiative requested dam-by-dam disclosure information from mining companies after 270 people were killed in the Vale tailings dam disaster at Brumadinho in Brazil. The request was issued to over 600 companies and was backed by 100 investors with nearly US$13 trillion in assets under management. Most major mining companies, Pearce said, have committed to implementing the standard and ERM sees this as a great step. “Our paper highlights the need to pay more attention to the human factors associated with managing dams safely and the importance of considering the downstream consequences, with much greater rigor,” Pearce said. “When implementing the global standards, mining companies need to place an early emphasis on the community and the human aspects equally with engineering design consideration.” “Are you talking to the communities? Do they really know how much time they have to react if something goes wrong?”
Originally published by Northern Miner.
Watch the vodcast – Working towards zero harm: tailings monitoring & governance in 2021
YotuWP warning: API Key was removed, please contact to your admin about this issues.
Effectively monitor your tailings storage facility with Decipher
- View real-time data and receive exceedance alerts
- Monitor land movement with remote sensing and InSAR datasets
- Visualise real-time LiDAR data with insights into dam movement
- Securely store and access all of your tailings data in the one place
- Upload and reference key documentation
- Visualise facilities across multiple sites in a single screen on a geospatial map
- Monitor your facilities with InSAR, LiDAR, DEM and more
- Capture a wide range of monitoring data and indicators su ch as surface and groundwater, decant pond water levels and quality, and embankment conditions
- Capture and track obligations and conditions around your licence to operate to manage your key risks and actions
- Action and task delegation for data collection with reminders
- Maintain and track environmental monitoring compliance limits and exceedances
- Manage and engage with all of your stakeholders with one central repository
- Convert your engagements into actionable outcomes
- Forecast, plan and track your sites activities using IBM’s Weather data
- Create corporate report templates and meet requests for data provision from industry groups such as ICMM, Global Tailings Portal, PRI and UNEP
- Integration capability with third party systems or public portals such as the Global Tailings Portal
Organise a free trial to see what’s possible today.
Request a demo
Want to find out more about tailings storage monitoring?
|
